July 16, 2004

Subject Icon: Smart Bombs, Stupid Wars
Posted by Foreign Correspondent Skates (Toronto) at 8:02 AM

Salon: Hersh Repeats Charge That U.S. Sodomized Children at Abu Ghraib

From Salon's War Room blog:

After Donald Rumsfeld testified on the Hill about Abu Ghraib in May, there was talk of more photos and video in the Pentagon's custody more horrific than anything made public so far. "If these are released to the public, obviously it's going to make matters worse," Rumsfeld said. Since then, the Washington Post has disclosed some new details and images of abuse at the prison. But if Seymour Hersh is right, it all gets much worse.

Hersh gave a speech last week to the ACLU making the charge that children were sodomized in front of women in the prison, and the Pentagon has tape of it. The speech was first reported in a New York Sun story last week, which was in turn posted on Jim Romenesko's media blog, and now EdCone.com and other blogs are linking to the video. We transcribed the critical section here (it starts at about 1:31:00 into the ACLU video.) At the start of the transcript here, you can see how Hersh was struggling over what he should say:

"Debating about it, ummm ... Some of the worst things that happened you don't know about, okay? Videos, um, there are women there. Some of you may have read that they were passing letters out, communications out to their men. This is at Abu Ghraib ... The women were passing messages out saying 'Please come and kill me, because of what's happened' and basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. And the worst above all of that is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror. It's going to come out."

"It's impossible to say to yourself how did we get there? Who are we? Who are these people that sent us there? When I did My Lai I was very troubled like anybody in his right mind would be about what happened. I ended up in something I wrote saying in the end I said that the people who did the killing were as much victims as the people they killed because of the scars they had, I can tell you some of the personal stories by some of the people who were in these units witnessed this. I can also tell you written complaints were made to the highest officers and so we're dealing with a enormous massive amount of criminal wrongdoing that was covered up at the highest command out there and higher, and we have to get to it and we will. We will. You know there's enough out there, they can't (Applause). .... So it's going to be an interesting election year."

Notes from a similar speech Hersh gave in Chicago in June were posted on Brad DeLong's blog. Rick Pearlstein, who watched the speech, wrote: "[Hersh] said that after he broke Abu Ghraib people are coming out of the woodwork to tell him this stuff. He said he had seen all the Abu Ghraib pictures. He said, 'You haven't begun to see evil...' then trailed off. He said, 'horrible things done to children of women prisoners, as the cameras run.' He looked frightened."

So, there are several questions here: Has Hersh actually seen the video he described to the ACLU, and why hasn't he written about it yet? Will he be forced to elaborate in more public venues now that these two speeches are getting so much attention, at least in the blogosphere? And who else has seen the video, if it exists -- will journalists see and report on it? did senators see these images when they had their closed-door sessions with the Abu Ghraib evidence? -- and what is being done about it?

Sensationalizing? Perhaps. But how would you have covered the Nazi death camps, or Pol Pot's killing fields before anyone suspected anything? We have to expose this if we are to be true to our values.


Comments

When CNN polled Americans to see if they approved of the release of the additional pictures/video back in May, 63% of respondents said no. I was greatly encouraged by our collective desire not to make a mockery of the tragedy of Abu Ghraib by endless showings of yet more hideous acts. I am a great believer in a truism that energy flows where attention goes and do not wish to see the worst of humanity splashed across the headlines. I don't know what good would come from releasing the information to the American people as those who already support the True Evil-Doer likely believe that the prisoners got nothing less than they deserve. It's possible they would be transformed if they knew the truth, but not likely. How many opportunites have they already had?!?!

Posted by: Jayne Harnisch at July 19, 2004 05:49 AM

I agree that the outrage fatigue has set in and big time, but if we are torturing children, it needs to be in the public's eye. This is activity that even the most ardent Bush supporter will find utterly indefensible and it will go a long way towards tearing down the wall of secrecy that this war has been cloaked in. Besides, if you think the Arab press doesn't know this ... they are saying awful things about us because we don't own up to our actions.

Posted by: Steven Staton at July 19, 2004 08:52 AM

I'm going to agree with Steve here. The involvement of children in this sickness is what will push it beyond the pale, shake the scales from even the most ardent, closed-minded supporters of this stupid war. If it seems such imagery would be an unbearable disclosure, that's all the more reason why we have to bear witness; these atrocities were committed in our time and putatively in our name. I would be glad to see the all the architects of this foulness shorn off at the ankles and brought to lasting ruin, on both a professional, and a very deep personal, level.

Posted by: Chief Engineering Officer Thomas at July 19, 2004 09:59 AM

Child abuse is just as unconscienable as the beheadings that took place. (prior to that, "putting a bag on someone's head" pales in comparison to what i endured in survival training). A word of caution: terrorists are very adept at media manipulation, anyone can post web media; they dont try to oppose large conventional military forces, they dont have to; just use-manipulate our media against us, and the american people are hopelessly divided and confused.

Posted by: allen at July 21, 2004 02:57 PM

I don't need to see any such pictures published, but I sure would like to see a *real* *empowered* *independant* investigation, and assuming these allegations are true, see that people responsible (and not just some Lance Corporal) charged with something significant, serving hard time.

I don't have a problem with self-policing, but the time has come and gone for any faith in that process to be deserved. I would rather this stuff be kept quiet. The system should expect abuses, seek them out, and when it finds them, correct them. No one expects America to be perfect, but to preach about The American Way, we have to take responsibility for our actions.

Oh, and by the way, isn't it time for these morons to stop taking pictures of themselves? If I were a prison commandant, I would ban private cameras entirely!

Posted by: Dennis at July 23, 2004 03:58 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?